Monday 24 May 2010

Regarding to the feedback


Hi guys. I think I understand what Anastasios and Manos said about our process now. We talked about “finding identity” as a concept of our design but looking at the logo or avatar, I don’t think they are helping the audience to find their identity. May be we tried to make them too special and we forgot about what they actually do. They can be very simple but still tells our concept.

-What we can do now-

I think the idea of typography and colours that we came up with can stay, I can change logo to follows our concept.

Avatar: If we keep the same idea, everyone in a class will end up having same avatar and this doesn’t really tell our concept of “finding identity”. If avatar will only appear in the student card, why can’t we combine the student photo and avatar and make something like this…


(Obviously, this is just an example and we can make it more appealing.)

Tell me what you think.

[image available at: http://www.greyrobot.com/portfolio/TV_Face.jpg]

7 comments:

  1. where did manos enter the equation Josh? are you having N+S flashbacks?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is MANOS KANELLOS who commented on Anastasios's feedback the same Manos we know?? I'm confused...

    ReplyDelete
  3. ohhh, I can't see that comment. fair enough then, it obviously is. I just can't see it. I apologise for mocking you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You made me feel ashamed! lol

    ReplyDelete
  6. ok i think we need to be commenting on the subject guys, i agree with josh i think this is possibly a better idea for avatar

    ReplyDelete
  7. i understand, and i agree...but if so, today's works become useless...revising slightly the 3 keywords made everything (or almost everything) sit together in the right way.
    I personally think that an external "viewer" doesn't see the connections because the written pieces we have ( the one that Frazer is writing) are not on the blog yet. With those, in my opinion, things will make more sense.

    ReplyDelete